The Creative Change Process
  • Home
  • Journal
  • Contact
  • Creativity Scholars Review
  • Creativity Models
  • Creativity Frameworks
    • About Us
  • Home
  • Journal
  • Contact
  • Creativity Scholars Review
  • Creativity Models
  • Creativity Frameworks
    • About Us
Search

Get Creative Week 5:  Diagnostic Thinking

4/27/2019

0 Comments

 
Diagnostic Thinking
                Often as a Change Manager, the scope of my work is focused on implementing the change according to the Change Management Plan.  As a contractor, I rarely am afforded the opportunity to assist with the analysis of the problem until the plan created by someone high up within the organization no longer seems feasible.  Diagnostic Thinking is a very important to the success of any change implementation.  According to Ranjay Gulati, speaker for the Harvard Business Review, Diagnostic Thinking is an essential quality of an effective leader.  When diagnosing problems within the organization, it is important to look at the problem and taking the time to diagnose the problem correctly as opposed to just jumping straight to the solution that first comes to mind as the ideal solution.  It is so common for leaders to just think they have the solution and implement without proper analysis of the problem. 
                The Monograph by Donald MacKinnon on the OSS Assessment Program, “How Assessment Centers Were Started in the United States,” depicts a scenario where diagnostic thinking was absent and leaders displayed more action-oriented decision making behavior.  In search of people who would make good spies or good guerilla fighters, someone decided the most logical selection would be to recruit murders and gang members.  As a result, the outcome was disastrous.  The powers to be realized that a more diagnostic thinking process was needed and sought the assistance of Psychologist, similar to that of the psychological/psychiatric assessment used in the English War Office Selection Boards, to be set up for the OSS.
                This was a step in the direction but still lacked the elements of diagnostic thinking.  Once again, this “action oriented” mindset lead to a hasty and premature initiation of the assessment program.   The program suffered because Psychologists were tasked with determining the type of person who would be best suited for the job without knowledge of what these jobs were.   Without any analyses of these jobs, these Psychologists could not possibly know what they were assessing.
                Being a retired military person, this really hit home.  Unfortunately, the military continues to make decisions in haste and often lacks diagnostic thinking.  This behavior is not just found in the military, but in civilian/commercial organizations also.  I found this monograph by Donald Mackinnon to be a great example of what happens in the absence of diagnostic thinking.
Works CitedGulati, R. (2013, March 12). Diagnostic Thinking. Retrieved from Harvard Business Review: https://hbr.org/video/2226699673001/diagnostic-thinking
MacKinnon, D. W. (2005). How Assessment Centers were Started in the United States. Retrieved from Development Dimension International (DDI) World : https://www.ddiworld.com/DDI/media/monographs/HowAssessmentCentersWereStarted_mg_ddi.pdf?ext=.pdf
 
​
0 Comments

Get Creative Week 8:  Breakthrough, Expand the Boundaries - Alex Osborn

4/26/2019

0 Comments

 
​Breakthrough, Expand the Boundaries
Alex Osborn
This week, as I reflected on my first days in the program, I recall taking the challenge that although I didn’t find myself to be a very creative person, I was going to learn enough about it to get a better understanding of how it worked in “Creative People.”  I didn’t think for a moment that I could possibly be a creative person.  My focus was on my practice in Organizational Change Management.  I wanted to find more creative ways to bring my clients the solutions they need and want. 
Alex Osborn’s perspective on creativity was music to my ears!  He went against status quo which was of the belief that only people who had this innate talent could be creative.  Instead, Osborn believed that anyone could be creative even if it meant teaching or guiding them through a creative process.  He further introduced brainstorming, which was an intricate part of stimulating the creative thought process.  In 1945, brainstorming and creative problem solving gained popularity in Osborn’s book Applied Imagination: Principles and Procedures of Creative Problem Solving.  Osborn is noteworthy for:
(1)    Founding the Creative Education Foundation (CEF) in 1954
(2)    Co-Founding the Creative Problem Solving Institute (CPSI) in 1954
(3)    Co-created with Sidney Parnes, the Osborn-Parnes Creative Problem Solving Process (CPS)
(4)    CEF sponsored a Leadership Convocation of the pioneers of the Creative Thinking Movement (1960)
I have truly benefited from Osborn’s work in the field of Creativity.  His research provided additional skills for me in my Change Management toolbelt.  Knowledge of Creative Problem Solving (CPS) allows me to better serve clients by helping them to find the best solutions.
 
Works CitedOsborn, A. (1948). Your Creative Power: How to Use Imagination. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.
Osborn, A. (1952). Wake Up Your Mind: 101 Ways To Develop Creativeness. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.
Osborn, A. (1963). Applied Imagination: Principles and Procedures of Creative Problem-Solving. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.
0 Comments

Get Creative Week 7:  Glimpse of the Future w/Anna Craft

4/26/2019

0 Comments

 
Glimpse of the Future
Anna Craft research interest was primarily in the future of education and learning.  As we moved into the computer age, Craft recognized that there were opportunities to create new approaches to learning.  She explored the way youth’s childhood was changing and the potential need to change the way we might need to change our education system.  Transforming our education system was a top priority and focusing educational design on imaginative education futures.  Craft’s research was exceptionally interesting to me because of my passion to make a change to our educational system in the Virgin Islands.  I would love to create Craft’s vision for an education system where learning occurs naturally as play on the playground.  Her writing is very inspirational as to the possibilities of “fostering imagination and creativity in all aspects of children’s learning.” Craft’s dedication and commitment to the work in the field of creativity in all aspects of children’s learning is beyond commendable.   

Works CitedCraft, A. (Ed.). (2005). Creativity in Schools: Tensions and Dilemmas. New York: Routledge.
Craft, A. (2006). Creativity Across the Primary Curriculum. New York: Routledge.
Craft, A. (2010, November). Creativity and Education Futures: Learning in a Digital Age. Staffordshire: Trentham Books Ltd. Retrieved from Eric: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED523399
Craft, A. J. (Ed.). (2001). Creativity in Education. London: Biddles Ltd.
 
​
0 Comments

Get Creative Week 6:   Visionary Thinking/Glimpse of the future

4/19/2019

0 Comments

 
     As I continue to prepare for my dissertation, my mind floats around the logical path of getting leaders to fully understand the value of creative facets of leadership such as appreciative inquiry and the most effective use of personality types. In my studies, I have found these two areas to be very important to the success of an organization. Similar to organized change management practices, I find that leaders often take the importance of these two valuable processes lightly.  According to Maxwell (2007), if you want lasting improvement, you must rely on a process. Although these processes encourage workforce development, helps build maturity in employees, it may often be difficult to implement. A leader should not be discouraged.  Maxwell (2007) later leads us through the process of the Law of Navigation where he discusses the importance of a leader carefully chartering the course of the organization. This Law of Navigation, examines the conditions before committing to the organization’s next steps. I propose that as leaders strategize their change implementations, they should consider all aspects of this law of navigation, the variables. For example, identifying personality traits prior to role selection is important to effectively executing the tasks.  Not having the right people positioned may not necessarily equate to failure but may cause a delay in the process. Using Appreciative Inquiry sets the climate and using a model, such as FOURSIGHT, ensures that tasks would be assigned more appropriately.  

​Works Cited(n.d.). Retrieved from FourSight: https://foursightonline.com/
Maxwell, J. C. (2007). The 21 Irrefutable Laws of Leadership. New York: Harper Collins Leadership.
Thathenkery, T. (2005). Appreciative Sharing of Knowledge: Leveraging Knowledge Management for Strategic Chang. New Mexico: Tao Institute Publications.


0 Comments

Get Creative Activity Week 4:  A Journey through the Life of Donald Wallace MacKinnon

4/5/2019

0 Comments

 
Donald Wallace MacKinnon
Psychologist and Professor Emeritus Donald Wallace MacKinnon was born on January 9, 1903, in Augusta, Maine.
EDUCATION
  • A.B. degree, summa cum laude, from Bowdoin College in 1925;
  • M.A. at Harvard University in 1926;
  • Ph.D. at Harvard in 1933. 
PROFESSOR
  • Bryn Mawr College
  • University of Maine
  • Harvard University
  • University of Minnesota
  • University of Hawaii
PUBLICATIONS
  • MacKinnon's first professional publication in psychology was in 1931, and his last in 1981, with over 100 papers, chapters, and books within that span. All of his writing was characterized by impeccable scholarship and graceful expression. Major themes may be noted, including creativity, personality structure, motivation, hypnotizable, and methodological issues in assessment.  Some of MacKinnon’s writings achieved classic status and are now standard reading for contemporary psychologists. Examples are:
  • Analysis of The Structure of Personality. 1944;
  • Book on Personality Assessment That He Co-Authored with Other Members Of The O.S.S. War-Time Staff (The Assessment of Men), 1948;
  • Walter Van Dyke Bingham lecture and American Psychologist article on the nature and nurture of creativity, 1962;
  • book In Search of Human Effectiveness, 1978.
  • EDITORIAL BOARDS
    He was active in editorial work outside of the University, serving at various times on the editorial boards:
  • Character and Personality (1940-44);
  • Contemporary Psychology (1956-70);
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (1944-61);
  • Psychological Bulletin (1960);
  • Journal of Creative Behavior (1969-87);
  • Innovacion Creadora (1977-87).
  • HONORS
  • The Walter Van Dyke Bingham Lectureship of the American Psychological Association, 1962;
  • The Richardson Foundation Creativity Award, 1967;
  • The Founder's Medal from the Creative Education Foundation, 1978;
  • Served on the Board of Trustees of the Creative Education Foundation, from 1974 until his death;
  • The Henry A. Murray Award from the American Psychological Association for distinguished theoretical and empirical work in the field of personality psychology, 1981.
  • NOTABLE WORK ASSIGNMENTS
    While a professorship at Bryn Mawr College, MacKinnon took a leave of absence from 1944-46 to serve as director of Station S in the U.S. Office of Strategic Services in World War II.  This organization was originally called the Office of the Coordinator of Information (COI). It was created by President Roosevelt to protect the United States from espionage, sabotage, “black” propaganda, guerrilla warfare, and other “un-American subversive practices.” MacKinnon developed assessments designed to identify persons who were “the best fit” for service within the OSS.
    In 1949, MacKinnon became the founding Director of the Assessment Center, the Institute of Personality Assessment and Research (IPAR).  This research program encompassed the study of the person within cultural, institutional, organizational and societal contexts. The center aim at the time was to apply an intensive, multi-method assessment program intended to gain an understanding of individuals who display outstanding personal effectiveness in their careers and lives.
    References Baumeister, R. F. (1991). Dialogue. Retrieved from Society for Personality and Social Psychology: http://spsp.org/sites/default/files/dialogue62.pdf
    MacKinnon, D. W. (1987). Some Critical Issues For Future Research in Creativity. The Creative Educator Foundation, Inc., 120-130.
    MacKinnon, D. W. (1994). How Assessment Centers Were Started in the United States. Pittsburg: Development Dimensions International, Inc.,.
     
0 Comments

Historical Timeline  -  Donald W. MacKinnon

4/3/2019

0 Comments

 
Picture
0 Comments

Creativity Scholar:  Donald W. MacKinnon

4/3/2019

0 Comments

 
Picture
0 Comments

    Stacy Creque-Smoot

    Student of Creative Learning & Processes

    Archives

    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.
  • Home
  • Journal
  • Contact
  • Creativity Scholars Review
  • Creativity Models
  • Creativity Frameworks
    • About Us